Monday, May 28, 2007

Religion, politics and sexual minorities

(Published - ST Forum, Online Story. May 28, 2007)

I have been following the online and printed articles on sexual minorities following MM Lee Kuan Yew's St James Power Station talk.

Now it seems that, along with science and acacdemia, religion has crept into the debate.

Religious fundamentalism and/or blinkered subscription to specific academic and scientific doctrine, whether religiously or politically charged, have severe social implications.

Based on the 'knowledge' generated from these seemingly legitimate fields, laws are imposed.

We have to look way back to Seventh Century A.D. Spain where Christianity and the monarchy justified persecution and violence to sexual minorities.
In another account, the definition bestiality is to have relations with someone (a human being) outside one's race, and this was defined by Christian leaders many centuries ago.

Christian Europe, by the 13th Century, came to regard sodomy as a 'wicked and unnatural vice' and legislation was enforced. Throughout that century, homosexual activity went from being completely legal in most of Europe to one that incurred the death penalty. Christianity was the motivation behind this.

Governed by the 'truths' in science and religion in the past century and a half, the following acts were performed on homosexuals: Surgical transplantation of testicular cells from straight men to gay men; castration of gay men; cerebral ablation of 'sexual deviants'; androgen replacement; aversive condition, including electrical, chemical and covert; hypnosis; and psychoanalysis. These acts would be otherwise condemned as inhuman in today's context.

Religious fundamentalists and blinkered academics who based their knowledge on dated information are often unable to account for changes in society, boundaries and socially-related definitions. These people need to understand the histories of their respective beliefs, however embarrassing, brutal, bloody and silly.

I recall one Singaporean motto that promotes life-long learning and recommend it for those who are impassioned by religious fundamentalism and blinkered academic subscription. Learning also involves understanding your past and knowing about your past through many sources, rather than only one source into which you might be already pre-conditioned and taken for the 'truth'.

There is no need for a moral panic. Sexual minorities are not a disease. All we have to do is to look at all the homosexuality-related moral panics in other countries in the past and the atrocities committed against them based on narrow and stubborn views.

We are Singapore. Let's not only embrace diversity, but also celebrate diversity while respecting one another's boundaries without encroachment.

Ho Chi Sam


MâHâßuß ßHuiyân said...

I just found your blog and want to say thank you ! What an enjoyable time looking through so many sites. It is really nice post thanks for sharing and just keep up the good work !

Search Engine Marketing| Computer Repair Unleashed | The Ultimate Guide To Password |cPanel 4 Newbies | Fix Windows Errors

Munchy said...

Sounds like christian europe is the originator of all evil?

I cant speak for other religious fundamentalists, such as muslim ones. But I would considered myself a Christian fundamentalist, simply because I go back to the fundamentals, the bible as a standard. (to be understood in its proper meaning, not twisted out-of-context)

Much of christian 'fundamentalism' is actually not fundamentalism, in the sense that it has departed from the bible as standard. For eg. if someone was to define having relations with another race as beastiality - this is simply not there in the bible.

There was 'violent' legislation against sexual immorality in the OT, but this was given to a specific pple group (Israelites), at a specific time, for a purpose. In the NT, the wrongness of sexual immorality has not changed, but early Christians understood that them enforcing the death penalty was not necessary for sexual immorality especially light of what Christ had done. Its hard to explain here, but the kingdom of God was no longer understood to be a cultural, physical, conventional kingdom, therefore many of these laws need not be enforced as they were previous with the Jews. (Some of these such laws, such as blasphemy, are still enforced today, in some other fundamentalist religions, because their fundamentals dictate so).

The point of me trying to explain all this, is that when Christian Europe did those things you mention (I wish u provided more specific references), they were actually going against God in doing so. They had departed from their true fundamentals, and become ‘fundamentalists’.

PS your comment authentication system is really difficult